<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail Pop email refresher &#8211; UPDATE &#8211; now smaller and easier!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/</link>
	<description>arduino, robots, cameras, motorcycles, and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:20:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TinyEnormous</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>TinyEnormous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>EyePulp: sadly, it looks like Gmail may have wised up to my plan! After a few weeks of running this google defaulted to checking my mail once or twice an hour. just like it regularly does. I&#039;m not sure if they figured it out, or if they just changed their rules for how that scheduling is figured out. I&#039;ll find another way. have no fear...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EyePulp: sadly, it looks like Gmail may have wised up to my plan! After a few weeks of running this google defaulted to checking my mail once or twice an hour. just like it regularly does. I&#8217;m not sure if they figured it out, or if they just changed their rules for how that scheduling is figured out. I&#8217;ll find another way. have no fear&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Slaughter</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-1596</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Slaughter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-1596</guid>
		<description>Interesting... I never considered using a 3rd party app outside of your browser to check POP3 accounts in Gmail. If you&#039;re looking for an in-browser solution for Firefox (on Windows or Mac) I wrote this Greasemonkey script that is pretty amazing:

http://www.danielslaughter.com/projects/gmail-pop3-checker-for-greasemonkey/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; I never considered using a 3rd party app outside of your browser to check POP3 accounts in Gmail. If you&#8217;re looking for an in-browser solution for Firefox (on Windows or Mac) I wrote this Greasemonkey script that is pretty amazing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.danielslaughter.com/projects/gmail-pop3-checker-for-greasemonkey/" rel="nofollow">http://www.danielslaughter.com/projects/gmail-pop3-checker-for-greasemonkey/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EyePulp</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>EyePulp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>This is a great trick.  I have a company who points its MX records at an Exchange server but I can&#039;t give up my gmail filtering and slickness, so I have a Google Apps account for our company domain, and do POP reads from actual to gmail.  I can&#039;t do forwards.  My question is, after you&#039;ve &quot;trained&quot; google, does it ever revert back to the slower pace?  How long does the improvement last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great trick.  I have a company who points its MX records at an Exchange server but I can&#8217;t give up my gmail filtering and slickness, so I have a Google Apps account for our company domain, and do POP reads from actual to gmail.  I can&#8217;t do forwards.  My question is, after you&#8217;ve &#8220;trained&#8221; google, does it ever revert back to the slower pace?  How long does the improvement last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TinyEnormous</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>TinyEnormous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-849</guid>
		<description>I agree that method does have its benefits, but if you get a lot of email then it can be tedious to have to open up each mail (because they are all from you) to see who sent it to you. Is there any way to forward while still being able to quickly identify the original sender?
There is no doubt that this is a hack, and not even a fully featured on at that, but it does serve a need.
I guess a better question might be: since I own all of the domains I am receiving email at, why don&#039;t I just set it up as imap? I don&#039;t have an answer for that. perhaps I should.
Thanks for your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that method does have its benefits, but if you get a lot of email then it can be tedious to have to open up each mail (because they are all from you) to see who sent it to you. Is there any way to forward while still being able to quickly identify the original sender?<br />
There is no doubt that this is a hack, and not even a fully featured on at that, but it does serve a need.<br />
I guess a better question might be: since I own all of the domains I am receiving email at, why don&#8217;t I just set it up as imap? I don&#8217;t have an answer for that. perhaps I should.<br />
Thanks for your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-848</guid>
		<description>I assume you are using gmail to check your POP account in order to take advantage of IMAP on gmail.

Wouldn&#039;t it be much more efficient simply to set-up mail forwarding on your old POP account&#039;s server -- and forward all incoming messages to gmail? 

Mine works this way, and instead of waiting for gmail to check my POP account whenever the Google algorithm determines it is time -- and as opposed to sending an onslaught of email messages to my gmail account to manually adjust the algorithm, I simply look at it from the other side. Have your POP account forward all incoming messages to your gmail account. 

This happens instantly when an email message arrives in your POP account. A second later, gmail behaves as you would expect any IMAP system to work... it sends the message on to your mail client instantaneously. 

Essentially, you are using gmail as a go-between -- enabling an old POP account to function as IMAP. But with only a minor change (via POP mail forwarding), the message flows from sender to your POP account to gmail to your mail client smoothly -- and without the (up to) 58 minute delay gmail&#039;s algorithm can impose. Also, bandwidth is only utilized when a message comes your way (as opposed to sending-deleting, sending-deleting etc. to trigger gmail to check for any new mail).

This seems like the most logical arrangement to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you are using gmail to check your POP account in order to take advantage of IMAP on gmail.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be much more efficient simply to set-up mail forwarding on your old POP account&#8217;s server &#8212; and forward all incoming messages to gmail? </p>
<p>Mine works this way, and instead of waiting for gmail to check my POP account whenever the Google algorithm determines it is time &#8212; and as opposed to sending an onslaught of email messages to my gmail account to manually adjust the algorithm, I simply look at it from the other side. Have your POP account forward all incoming messages to your gmail account. </p>
<p>This happens instantly when an email message arrives in your POP account. A second later, gmail behaves as you would expect any IMAP system to work&#8230; it sends the message on to your mail client instantaneously. </p>
<p>Essentially, you are using gmail as a go-between &#8212; enabling an old POP account to function as IMAP. But with only a minor change (via POP mail forwarding), the message flows from sender to your POP account to gmail to your mail client smoothly &#8212; and without the (up to) 58 minute delay gmail&#8217;s algorithm can impose. Also, bandwidth is only utilized when a message comes your way (as opposed to sending-deleting, sending-deleting etc. to trigger gmail to check for any new mail).</p>
<p>This seems like the most logical arrangement to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 用 Automator 让 Gmail 自动刷新 POP3 邮箱 &#124; 谷奥——探寻谷歌的奥秘</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>用 Automator 让 Gmail 自动刷新 POP3 邮箱 &#124; 谷奥——探寻谷歌的奥秘</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-842</guid>
		<description>[...] TINYenormous  本站文章除注明转载外，均为本站原创编译 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TINYenormous  本站文章除注明转载外，均为本站原创编译 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Gmail Check Your POP Accounts More Frequently [Gmail Tip] - 4960th Edition &#124; Technology Revealed</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Gmail Check Your POP Accounts More Frequently [Gmail Tip] - 4960th Edition &#124; Technology Revealed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-797</guid>
		<description>[...] so you can be sure your POP account is checking at more reasonable intervals. The post suggests setting up some Terminal scripts with Automator to send your POP account emails on a regular basis, then filtering out those emails when they hit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so you can be sure your POP account is checking at more reasonable intervals. The post suggests setting up some Terminal scripts with Automator to send your POP account emails on a regular basis, then filtering out those emails when they hit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Gmail Check Your POP Accounts More Frequently [Gmail Tip] &#124; Superstars Of Gaming</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Gmail Check Your POP Accounts More Frequently [Gmail Tip] &#124; Superstars Of Gaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-790</guid>
		<description>[...] so you can be sure your POP account is checking at more reasonable intervals. The post suggests setting up some Terminal scripts with Automator to send your POP account emails on a regular basis, then filtering out those emails when they hit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so you can be sure your POP account is checking at more reasonable intervals. The post suggests setting up some Terminal scripts with Automator to send your POP account emails on a regular basis, then filtering out those emails when they hit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Gmail Check Your POP Accounts More Frequently &#124; Lifehacker Australia</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Gmail Check Your POP Accounts More Frequently &#124; Lifehacker Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-786</guid>
		<description>[...] so you can be sure your POP account is checking at more reasonable intervals. The post suggests setting up some Terminal scripts with Automator to send your POP account emails on a regular basis, then filtering out those emails when they hit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so you can be sure your POP account is checking at more reasonable intervals. The post suggests setting up some Terminal scripts with Automator to send your POP account emails on a regular basis, then filtering out those emails when they hit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Increase the frequency that Gmail checks your POP mail account &#124; TINYenormous - Build it up to break it down again</title>
		<link>http://blog.tinyenormous.com/2009/08/25/gmail-pop-email-refresher-update-now-smaller-and-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Increase the frequency that Gmail checks your POP mail account &#124; TINYenormous - Build it up to break it down again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tinyenormous.com/?p=562#comment-783</guid>
		<description>[...] Gmail Pop email refresher &#8211; UPDATE &#8211; now smaller and easier! &#124; TINYenormous - Build it u...  // Aug 25, 2009 at 2:29 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gmail Pop email refresher &#8211; UPDATE &#8211; now smaller and easier! | TINYenormous &#8211; Build it u&#8230;  // Aug 25, 2009 at 2:29 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
